Our Blog

poor-road-maintenance-car-accident-liability

Can Poor Road Maintenance Cause a Car Accident? Here’s Who May Be Liable

A car accident is not always caused entirely by one careless driver. Potholes, missing warning signs, malfunctioning traffic signals, poorly marked construction zones, dangerous drainage, damaged guardrails, and debris left in travel lanes can all contribute to a serious collision.

When a dangerous road condition helps cause an accident, responsibility may extend beyond the drivers involved. A state agency, city, county, road contractor, construction company, utility provider, or private property owner may have played a role in creating or failing to correct the hazard.

Claims involving Utah roads are complicated because many streets and highways are controlled by government entities. Governmental immunity, notice requirements, shortened deadlines, and special limits may apply. Utah law also preserves immunity for certain latent road defects, making the visibility and discoverability of the condition especially important.

Steele Adams Hosman helps injured Utah residents determine who controlled the road, whether the responsible party had notice of the danger, and what legal procedures must be followed to preserve a claim.

What Types of Poor Road Maintenance Can Cause Accidents?

Road maintenance includes much more than filling potholes. Agencies and contractors may be responsible for inspecting roads, maintaining traffic controls, responding to reports, managing construction zones, and correcting hazards that create an unreasonable risk.

Potentially dangerous conditions include:

  • Large or deep potholes
  • Broken pavement
  • Uneven road surfaces
  • Missing lane markings
  • Faded crosswalks
  • Malfunctioning traffic signals
  • Missing or damaged stop signs
  • Inadequate construction warnings
  • Loose gravel
  • Road debris
  • Standing water
  • Poor drainage
  • Accumulated ice
  • Damaged guardrails
  • Obstructed sightlines
  • Unsecured utility covers
  • Unsafe shoulder drop-offs
  • Inadequate lighting
  • Improperly placed barriers
  • Defective bridge surfaces

Utah’s climate can make some road hazards more difficult to manage. Repeated freezing and thawing may damage pavement, while winter storms can create ice, reduced visibility, and blocked lane markings.

Road construction along I-15, I-80, State Street, and other heavily traveled Wasatch Front routes can also change traffic patterns quickly. Drivers may encounter sudden lane shifts, uneven pavement, narrowed shoulders, or confusing temporary markings.

The existence of a hazardous condition does not automatically establish negligence. The claim usually requires evidence that the responsible person or entity failed to act reasonably under the circumstances.

Can a Pothole Cause a Serious Car Accident?

Yes. A pothole can cause more than a damaged tire.

A driver who strikes a deep pothole may:

  • Lose control of the vehicle
  • Enter another lane
  • Swerve into oncoming traffic
  • Experience a tire blowout
  • Damage the steering or suspension
  • Be thrown from a motorcycle
  • Brake suddenly and cause a rear-end collision
  • Strike a pedestrian or cyclist
  • Roll over after leaving the roadway

Motorcyclists and bicyclists may face especially serious risks because even a relatively small pavement defect can destabilize a two-wheeled vehicle.

A pothole claim may depend on whether the agency or contractor responsible for the road knew or reasonably should have known that the defect existed. Reports from drivers, prior repair orders, inspection records, photographs, and evidence showing that the pothole had existed for an extended period may all be relevant.

The Utah Department of Transportation provides a process for submitting claims involving vehicle or property damage allegedly caused by potholes, road conditions, or construction problems on state-maintained roads. UDOT cautions that submitting a claim does not mean liability has been accepted, and its Risk Management Division states that reimbursement is available only when negligence is clearly demonstrated.

A property-damage claim submitted through an agency website should not be confused with preserving a personal injury lawsuit. Separate notice and filing requirements may apply.

Were you hurt after encountering a dangerous road condition? Contact Steele Adams Hosman promptly. Government claim deadlines may begin running before the full extent of your injuries is known.

Who Is Responsible for Maintaining a Utah Road?

Responsibility depends on who owns, controls, or has contracted to maintain the specific roadway.

Potentially responsible parties may include:

  • The Utah Department of Transportation
  • A city
  • A county
  • A town
  • A road district
  • A construction contractor
  • A subcontractor
  • A snow-removal company
  • A utility company
  • A private developer
  • A commercial property owner
  • A trucking or hauling company that dropped debris
  • A manufacturer of defective road equipment

UDOT handles state and federal highways under its control. Its public reporting system specifically identifies roads such as I-15, State Street/U.S. 89, and Redwood Road/S.R. 68 as examples of state-maintained routes. Problems on other roads may need to be directed to the relevant city or county.

Ownership alone may not answer the liability question. A government agency may have hired a private contractor to perform construction or maintenance. UDOT notes that independent contractors working within designated project limits may be responsible for managing claims related to alleged project damage.

Steele Adams Hosman may review:

  • Road ownership records
  • Construction contracts
  • Maintenance agreements
  • Project boundaries
  • Work orders
  • Inspection reports
  • Public complaints
  • Repair histories
  • Traffic-control plans
  • Agency communications

Identifying the correct entity is essential. Sending notice to the wrong agency or assuming that UDOT controls every Utah road can create serious problems.

When Can a Government Entity Be Liable for a Road Defect?

Utah government entities generally begin with broad immunity for governmental functions. A claim may proceed only when the Governmental Immunity Act waives that immunity and no separate exception restores it.

Road-condition claims require careful analysis because Utah law preserves immunity for injuries connected to a latent dangerous or latent defective condition of a highway, road, street, alley, crosswalk, sidewalk, culvert, tunnel, bridge, viaduct, or related structure.

“Latent” generally refers to a condition that is hidden or not reasonably discoverable. The precise legal analysis depends on the facts and applicable Utah decisions.

This creates an important distinction:

  • A recently developed, concealed defect that reasonable inspection would not reveal may fall within an immunity provision.
  • A visible, reported, recurring, or long-standing condition may present a different question.

For example, a sinkhole that develops beneath the pavement without visible warning may raise a different immunity issue than a large pothole repeatedly reported over several weeks.

Government liability is never established merely by showing that a public road was imperfect. Steele Adams Hosman must analyze whether immunity was waived, whether an exception applies, and whether the entity’s conduct legally caused the injury.

What Does Notice of the Road Hazard Mean?

Notice refers to whether the responsible party knew or should have known about the dangerous condition.

Actual Notice

Actual notice may exist when:

  • A driver reported the pothole
  • Police documented the danger
  • An employee inspected the condition
  • A repair order was created
  • A prior accident occurred at the same location
  • A contractor informed the agency
  • Residents repeatedly complained
  • The entity created the hazard

UDOT operates a “Click ’N Fix” service through which members of the public may report potholes and traffic-signal problems on state-maintained roads. Reports submitted through such systems may become relevant when determining whether an agency was alerted to a hazard.

Constructive Notice

Constructive notice may exist when the condition remained present long enough or was sufficiently obvious that a reasonably careful entity should have discovered it.

Evidence may include:

  • The size and deterioration of the defect
  • Weather history
  • Prior maintenance schedules
  • Inspection frequency
  • Photographs showing an aged condition
  • Witness accounts
  • Repeated temporary repairs
  • Employee travel through the area
  • Similar prior complaints

A road agency is not necessarily required to discover and repair every defect immediately. The issue is whether its inspection and response were reasonable under the circumstances.

Can a Private Road Contractor Be Responsible?

Yes. A private contractor may be responsible if its work creates an unsafe condition or if it fails to carry out its contractual safety obligations with reasonable care.

Examples may include:

  • Leaving debris in a travel lane
  • Creating an unsafe pavement edge
  • Failing to install required warning signs
  • Using confusing temporary lane markings
  • Placing barriers incorrectly
  • Allowing equipment to obstruct visibility
  • Failing to repair a known construction defect
  • Performing inadequate snow or ice removal
  • Leaving an excavation unsecured
  • Failing to follow a traffic-control plan

A government agency’s immunity does not automatically protect an independent private company. However, contractors may raise their own defenses, contractual provisions, or statutory protections.

UDOT confirms that it partners with independent contractors on construction and maintenance projects and that contractors may manage claims arising within designated project limits.

A contract can help establish which party had responsibility for inspections, warning signs, lane closures, pavement repairs, or emergency responses.

A government agency and a private contractor may point fingers at each other after an accident. Let Steele Adams Hosman determine who controlled the work and who had the responsibility to correct the danger.

Can Poor Construction-Zone Management Cause Liability?

Construction zones require drivers to respond to changing lanes, reduced speeds, workers, equipment, and temporary traffic controls.

Potentially negligent construction-zone conditions include:

  • Inconsistent lane markings
  • Signs placed too close to a lane closure
  • Missing advance warnings
  • Barriers extending into travel lanes
  • Sudden pavement elevation changes
  • Inadequate nighttime lighting
  • Equipment blocking sightlines
  • Improper merging instructions
  • Unsecured construction materials
  • Signals that conflict with temporary signs

Responsibility may be shared among the road owner, project engineer, general contractor, traffic-control subcontractor, and drivers involved in the crash.

A driver may still bear some fault for speeding or failing to pay attention. At the same time, a contractor may be responsible for creating a confusing or unreasonably dangerous traffic pattern.

Utah’s comparative fault system allows percentages of responsibility to be assigned among multiple parties. A complete investigation should therefore examine both driver conduct and road-management failures.

Can Missing or Malfunctioning Traffic Signals Cause an Accident?

Yes. A missing stop sign, obscured warning sign, defective signal, or incorrectly timed light may contribute to a collision.

Potential evidence includes:

  • Traffic camera footage
  • Signal-maintenance logs
  • Service requests
  • Police reports
  • Witness statements
  • Photographs
  • Prior complaints
  • Electrical records
  • Timing and programming data
  • Construction activity near the signal

A government entity may argue that it had no notice that the signal malfunctioned. A utility or contractor may be responsible if recent work damaged the equipment.

Drivers still have duties when a signal is dark or malfunctioning. Therefore, the conduct of each driver will also be evaluated.

The fact that one driver received a citation does not necessarily eliminate a separate claim involving defective traffic controls.

What If Water, Snow, or Ice Made the Road Dangerous?

Weather-related road cases can be difficult because government entities cannot prevent every natural hazard or immediately clear every road during a storm.

A claim may be stronger when negligence creates or worsens the condition.

Examples include:

  • Defective drainage causing recurring roadway ice
  • A blocked storm drain causing standing water
  • Snowplowing that leaves a dangerous obstruction
  • Water discharged onto a roadway by nearby property
  • Failure to warn of a known recurring freeze zone
  • Construction that redirects runoff into traffic lanes

Utah’s Governmental Immunity Act includes specific provisions addressing injuries connected to certain natural conditions, so each weather-related claim requires close statutory review.

A driver must also operate at a reasonable speed for conditions. An insurer may argue that the driver should have slowed down, used greater following distance, or avoided travel.

Steele Adams Hosman can examine whether the weather was the sole cause or whether inadequate drainage, construction, maintenance, or warning measures contributed.

Can Road Debris Create Liability?

Road debris may come from:

  • An unsecured commercial load
  • Construction work
  • A damaged vehicle
  • Fallen signs or barriers
  • Landscaping operations
  • Improperly maintained roadside property
  • Government maintenance activity
  • Natural events

The responsible party may be the person or company that dropped the material rather than the agency responsible for the road.

For example, if construction equipment falls from a trailer on I-80 and causes a multi-vehicle collision, liability may rest primarily with the driver, trucking company, vehicle owner, or loading company.

If government employees were notified of the debris but failed to respond within a reasonable time, a separate issue involving road management may arise.

Video, dispatch records, emergency calls, commercial records, and witness statements can help establish when the debris appeared and who created it.

What Is Utah’s Notice-of-Claim Requirement?

A person seeking damages from a Utah government entity generally must file a written notice of claim before maintaining a lawsuit. Utah Code Section 63G-7-401 governs where and how notice must be submitted.

The notice must be directed to the legally designated person or office. Merely telling a police officer, road worker, claims adjuster, or maintenance employee about the accident may not satisfy the statutory requirement.

The formal notice generally includes information such as:

  • A brief statement of the facts
  • The nature of the claim
  • The damages incurred
  • The claimant’s identifying information
  • Information sufficient to identify the government entity and conduct involved

The exact statutory requirements should be reviewed before filing. A technically defective notice may lead to challenges even when the agency already knows that an accident happened.

How Long Do You Have to File a Utah Government Notice?

Utah Code Section 63G-7-402 generally bars a claim unless the notice of claim is filed according to statutory requirements within one year after the claim arises.

This one-year requirement is not necessarily the final deadline for filing the lawsuit. It is an earlier procedural step that must generally be completed before the court action proceeds.

Current Utah law also requires a government entity, representative, or insurance carrier to provide written acknowledgment of receipt within 60 days after a notice is filed. The statute separately addresses when a claimant may commence an action in district court.

Because several deadlines can apply, an injured person should not wait until the ordinary personal injury limitation period is nearly over.

Failing to file a proper government notice on time may end the claim even when the road defect clearly contributed to the accident.

Is Reporting a Pothole to UDOT the Same as Filing a Legal Notice?

No.

UDOT allows members of the public to report road problems through Click ’N Fix and to submit certain property-damage claims through its public claims system.

These tools can be useful, but they should not automatically be treated as compliance with the Governmental Immunity Act’s formal notice-of-claim requirements.

Different documents serve different purposes:

  • A service request tells the agency that a road problem needs attention.
  • A damage claim asks the agency to evaluate property loss.
  • A statutory notice of claim preserves the ability to pursue a covered legal action against a government entity.

Submitting the wrong form or sending it to the wrong recipient may not protect the personal injury case.

Steele Adams Hosman can determine whether the responsible entity is UDOT, a municipality, a county, another agency, or a private contractor and then take the appropriate legal steps.

What Evidence Can Prove a Poor Road Maintenance Claim?

These cases often require more than a police report and photographs of vehicle damage.

Helpful evidence may include:

  • Photographs of the road defect
  • Video of the accident
  • Dashcam footage
  • Traffic-camera recordings
  • Measurements of the pothole or pavement defect
  • Witness statements
  • Previous complaints
  • UDOT or municipal service requests
  • Maintenance logs
  • Inspection records
  • Repair work orders
  • Construction contracts
  • Traffic-control plans
  • Weather records
  • Emergency dispatch records
  • Prior accident reports
  • Vehicle event data
  • Accident reconstruction analysis

Take wide-angle photographs showing where the condition was located as well as close-up images showing its size and depth.

Include identifiable landmarks, lane markings, signs, and nearby intersections. When safe, use a measuring tool or another object to show scale.

Do not enter an active traffic lane to obtain evidence. Steele Adams Hosman can arrange professional inspection, mapping, or expert analysis when necessary.

Why Does Evidence Need to Be Collected Quickly?

Road conditions change.

A pothole may be filled the following day. Construction barriers may be moved overnight. Snow and ice may melt. Lane markings may be repainted. Surveillance footage may be overwritten.

Government records may preserve part of the history, but physical and visual evidence from the time of the accident can be especially persuasive.

Early action can help Steele Adams Hosman:

  • Photograph and measure the condition
  • Locate witnesses
  • Preserve traffic or business video
  • Request maintenance records
  • Identify relevant construction contractors
  • Determine the responsible government entity
  • File a timely notice of claim
  • Inspect the damaged vehicle
  • Retain an accident reconstruction professional

The road may be repaired long before your injuries heal. Call Steele Adams Hosman promptly so the condition and maintenance history can be documented.

Can Another Driver and a Road Agency Both Be Responsible?

Yes.

A dangerous road condition may contribute to an accident without completely excusing a negligent driver.

Consider a crash in which:

  • A large pothole causes Driver A to swerve.
  • Driver B is following too closely.
  • Driver B strikes Driver A and pushes the vehicle into another lane.
  • Driver A was also traveling too quickly for the conditions.

Responsibility could potentially be divided among the road entity, Driver A, and Driver B.

Utah’s comparative fault rules permit responsibility to be allocated among multiple people and entities. The injured person’s own percentage of fault may reduce or, at the statutory threshold, prevent recovery.

Steele Adams Hosman evaluates the entire chain of causation rather than focusing only on the last vehicle that made contact.

What Compensation May Be Available?

If liability is established, compensation may be available for:

  • Ambulance transportation
  • Emergency treatment
  • Hospitalization
  • Surgery
  • Rehabilitation
  • Future medical care
  • Lost wages
  • Reduced earning capacity
  • Property damage
  • Pain and suffering
  • Emotional distress
  • Physical impairment
  • Disfigurement
  • Loss of enjoyment of life

Government claims may be subject to statutory limits on judgments. The Governmental Immunity Act contains special procedures, requirements, and damages limitations for claims against Utah government entities.

A private contractor or negligent driver may have separate insurance coverage and may not receive the same governmental protections.

Identifying every responsible party can therefore affect both the legal theory and the amount of compensation that may realistically be recovered.

What Should You Do After an Accident Caused by a Road Hazard?

When possible:

  • Move to safety. Do not remain in an active lane to inspect the road.
  • Call law enforcement. Ask that the road condition be documented in the report.
  • Obtain medical care. Some injuries may not be immediately apparent.
  • Photograph the condition. Include its location, size, surrounding signs, and roadway context.
  • Photograph vehicle damage. Document tires, wheels, suspension components, and impact areas.
  • Identify witnesses. Obtain names and contact information.
  • Save dashcam footage. Download it before the system overwrites the recording.
  • Keep damaged parts. Do not discard a blown tire or broken wheel without obtaining advice.
  • Report the road condition. This may help prevent another accident, but do not assume the report preserves your legal claim.
  • Contact Steele Adams Hosman. Government notice periods and evidence-retention concerns require prompt attention.

Frequently Asked Questions About Poor Road Maintenance Claims

Is the government responsible for every pothole accident?

No. The injured person must establish an available waiver of immunity, negligence, causation, damages, and compliance with special procedural rules. Utah also preserves immunity for certain latent road defects.

How do I know whether UDOT or a city controls the road?

The road’s route designation, ownership records, maintenance agreements, and jurisdiction must be reviewed. UDOT identifies I-15, State Street/U.S. 89, and Redwood Road/S.R. 68 as examples of state-maintained roads, while other concerns may belong to local governments.

Can I sue a construction contractor?

Potentially. A private contractor may be responsible if negligent work or traffic control created the unsafe condition. UDOT acknowledges that contractors may handle claims arising within designated project limits.

What if the pothole was repaired after my crash?

A repair does not automatically eliminate the claim, but it makes photographs, video, measurements, witness testimony, and maintenance records especially important.

Does submitting a UDOT damage claim preserve my injury lawsuit?

Do not assume that it does. UDOT’s property-damage process and Utah’s statutory government notice requirements are separate matters.

How quickly must I act?

A Utah government notice generally must be filed within one year after the claim arises, but evidence can disappear much sooner.

What if another driver was also negligent?

Responsibility may be divided among the driver, government entity, contractor, and other contributing parties.

Can I recover only for vehicle damage?

No. When the legal requirements are met, a claim may also include medical expenses, lost income, pain, impairment, and other personal injury damages.

What if I reported the pothole before my accident?

Save confirmation emails, screenshots, reference numbers, and photographs. A prior report may help establish that the responsible entity had notice.

Contact Steele Adams Hosman After a Road-Condition Accident

Poor road maintenance can contribute to severe car, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents. However, establishing responsibility requires more than proving that a pothole, missing sign, or construction defect existed.

The claim may depend on who controlled the road, whether the condition was discoverable, whether the responsible entity had notice, whether a private contractor was involved, and whether Utah’s governmental immunity procedures were followed.

Steele Adams Hosman provides knowledgeable, personalized, and trial-ready representation to injured people throughout Salt Lake City, Sugar House, Millcreek, South Jordan, and surrounding Wasatch Front communities.

Steele Adams Hosman can investigate the roadway, obtain maintenance and construction records, identify responsible agencies and contractors, preserve physical evidence, comply with government notice requirements, and pursue compensation from every party whose conduct contributed to the accident.

Do not wait for the road to be repaired and the evidence to disappear. Call Steele Adams Hosman today for a free consultation.

A dangerous road claim may involve strict deadlines and several responsible parties. Let Steele Adams Hosman protect your rights while you focus on medical treatment and recovery.